Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection by samples from" » "code detection by samples from" (Expand search), "border detection by samples from" (Expand search), "corner detection by samples from" (Expand search), "coder detection _ samples from" (Expand search), "coder detection and samples from" (Expand search), "coder detection by sample from" (Expand search), "coder detection b samples from" (Expand search), "coder detection by simples from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection by samples from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection by samples from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder detection by samples from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.