Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection based examples from" » "code detection based examples from" (Expand search), "border detection based examples from" (Expand search), "corner detection based examples from" (Expand search), "coder detection and examples from" (Expand search), "coder detection based samples from" (Expand search), "coder detection basin examples from" (Expand search), "coder detection case examples from" (Expand search), "coder detection based example from" (Expand search), "coder detection based examples of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder detection based examples from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection based examples from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection based examples from ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder detection based examples from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.