Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detecting lower complexity from" » "coder detecting low complexity from" (Expand search), "coder detecting motor complexity from" (Expand search), "coder detecting code complexity from" (Expand search), "model detecting lower complexity from" (Expand search), "code detection lower complexity from" (Expand search), "hole detecting lower complexity from" (Expand search), "coder detecting liver complexity from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detecting lower complexity from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detecting lower complexity from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder detecting lower complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.