Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder depending on logarithmic functions" » "coder depending on logarithmic function" (Expand search), "costs depending on logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "country depending on logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "content depending on logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder depending of logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder depending in logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder depending and logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder dependent on logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder depends on logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder depending on logarithmic functions") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder depending on logarithmic functions\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder depending on logarithmic functions ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder depending on logarithmic functions") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.