Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoding human algorithmic functions" » "coder decoding human logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoding human logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder decoding human algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder decoding human algorithm functions" (Expand search), "coder decoding an algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoding humano algoritmicas functions" (Expand search), "coding decoding human algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder human algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "barcode decoding human algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder becoming human algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder feeding human algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder developing human algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ piton python python programming" » "_ piton pythons python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton pytm python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ in python python programming" (Expand search), "_ with python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoding human algorithmic functions") OR ("_ piton python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoding human algorithmic functions\") OR (\"_ piton python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoding human algorithmic functions ) OR ( _ piton python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoding human algorithmic functions") OR ("_ piton python python programming"))*.