Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoding human algorithm parallelization" » "coder decoding human automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoding human algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoding neumann algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoding an algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coding decoding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoder human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "barcode decoding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder becoming human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder feeding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder developing human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoding human algorithm parallelization") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoding human algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoding human algorithm parallelization ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))*.