Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder using preference function" » "coder decoder using preference formation" (Expand search), "coder decoder using deterrence function" (Expand search), "coder decoder using reference function" (Expand search), "coder decoder laying preference function" (Expand search), "coder decoder mating preference function" (Expand search), "encoder decoder using preference function" (Expand search), "coder disorder using preference function" (Expand search), "coder decoding using preference function" (Expand search), "coder cover using preference function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder using preference function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder using preference function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder using preference function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.