Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder using computation parallelization" » "coder decoder using cooperative parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoder using computational characterization" (Expand search), "coder decoder using computational parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoder using imputation parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoder using compilation parallelization" (Expand search), "encoder decoder using computation parallelization" (Expand search), "coder disorder using computation parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoding using computation parallelization" (Expand search), "coder cover using computation parallelization" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder using computation parallelization") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder using computation parallelization\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder using computation parallelization ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.