Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder using algorithmic functions" » "coder decoder using logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder using logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder decoder using algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder decoder using algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder in algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder setting algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "encoder decoder using algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder disorder using algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoding using algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cover using algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ piton python python programming" » "_ piton pythons python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton pytm python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ in python python programming" (Expand search), "_ with python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder using algorithmic functions") OR ("_ piton python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder using algorithmic functions\") OR (\"_ piton python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder using algorithmic functions ) OR ( _ piton python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder using algorithmic functions") OR ("_ piton python python programming"))*.