Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder modeling using processed" » "coder cover modeling using processed" (Expand search), "coder decoder model using processed" (Expand search), "coder decoder models using processed" (Expand search), "coder decoder modeling using reprocessed" (Expand search), "coder decoder modeling using process" (Expand search), "coder decoder modeling being processed" (Expand search), "encoder decoder modeling using processed" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder modeling using processed\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder modeling using processed ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder modeling using processed") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.