Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder in algorithmic functions" » "coder decoder in logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder in logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder decoder in algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder decoder an algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder on algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder and algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "encoder decoder in algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder recorder in algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder _ algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder using algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder in algorithmic functions") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder in algorithmic functions\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder in algorithmic functions ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder in algorithmic functions") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.