Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder going cobol programming" » "coder decoder going robot programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder going control programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder going robots programming" (Expand search), "encoder decoder going cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder using cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder codes going cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder in cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder going global programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder going mobile programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder going cobol programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder going cobol programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder going cobol programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder going cobol programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.