Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder consuming logical programming" » "coder decoder consuming logic programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder consuming physical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder consuming goal programming" (Expand search), "coder modes consuming logical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder consuming digital programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder consumo logicas programming" (Expand search), "encoder decoder consuming logical programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder consuming logical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder consuming logical programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder consuming logical programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder consuming logical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.