Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder coding process effect" » "coder decoder codecs process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder using process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder codec process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coping process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coking process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder decoding process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding process effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding processing effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding proteins effect" (Expand search), "encoder decoder coding process effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder coding process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder coding process effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder coding process effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder coding process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.