Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder coding based effect" » "coder decoder codecs based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder using based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder codec based effect" (Expand search), "encoder decoder coding based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coating based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder modeling based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder reading based effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding based effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding biased effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding base effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder decoder coding based effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder coding based effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder coding based effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder coding based effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.