Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder cutting grasp logarithmic functions" » "coder cutting grasp logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder cutting and logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cutting dual logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cutting exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "under cutting grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "node cutting grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "over cutting grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cutting grafts logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cutting frame logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder routing grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"in pitons python python programming" » "in pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in pigeons python python programming" (Expand search), "in picos python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder cutting grasp logarithmic functions") OR ("in pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder cutting grasp logarithmic functions\") OR (\"in pitons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder cutting grasp logarithmic functions ) OR ( in pitons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder cutting grasp logarithmic functions") OR ("in pitons python python programming"))*.