Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coverage using logistic programming" » "coder coverage using linguistic programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using heuristic programming" (Expand search), "code coverage using logistic programming" (Expand search), "cancer coverage using logistic programming" (Expand search), "center coverage using logistic programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage in logistic programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage among logistic programming" (Expand search), "coder cover using logistic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coverage using logistic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coverage using logistic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coverage using logistic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coverage using logistic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.