Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coverage using factored programming" » "coder coverage using tactode programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using vector programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using core programming" (Expand search), "code coverage using factored programming" (Expand search), "cancer coverage using factored programming" (Expand search), "center coverage using factored programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage in factored programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage among factored programming" (Expand search), "coder cover using factored programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using factor programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using factors programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using factorial programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coverage using factored programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coverage using factored programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coverage using factored programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.