Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coverage using conic programing" » "coder coverage using conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage using cone programing" (Expand search), "coder coverage using logic programming" (Expand search), "code coverage using conic programing" (Expand search), "cancer coverage using conic programing" (Expand search), "center coverage using conic programing" (Expand search), "coder coverage in conic programing" (Expand search), "coder coverage among conic programing" (Expand search), "coder cover using conic programing" (Expand search), "coder coverage using ionic programing" (Expand search), "coder coverage using comics programing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coverage using conic programing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coverage using conic programing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coverage using conic programing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coverage using conic programing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.