Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coverage in octave programming" » "coder coverage in stage programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage in objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage in reactive programming" (Expand search), "code coverage in octave programming" (Expand search), "cancer coverage in octave programming" (Expand search), "center coverage in octave programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage of octave programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage n octane programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage _ octave programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coverage in octave programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coverage in octave programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coverage in octave programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.