Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder cover's discourse reactive programming" » "coder cover's discourse objective programming" (Expand search), "coder cover's discourse teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder cover's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder cover's discourse practice programming" (Expand search), "coder cover's discourse practices programming" (Expand search), "coder cover's discourse narrative programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coverage discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder worker's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "cover cover discourse reactive programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder cover's discourse reactive programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder cover's discourse reactive programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder cover's discourse reactive programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.