Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder counting function predicts programming" » "coder counting function devices programming" (Expand search), "coder counting function production programming" (Expand search), "coder counting function mapreduce programming" (Expand search), "coder coupling functions predicts programming" (Expand search), "coder coping function predicts programming" (Expand search), "coder counting education predicts programming" (Expand search), "coder counting functions predict programming" (Expand search), "coder counting function prediction programming" (Expand search), "coder counting functional predictions programming" (Expand search), "power counting function predicts programming" (Expand search), "model counting function predicts programming" (Expand search), "body counting function predicts programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder counting function predicts programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder counting function predicts programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder counting function predicts programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.