Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder convolution functions application in" » "coder correlation functions application in" (Expand search), "coder contraction functions application in" (Expand search), "coder composition functions application in" (Expand search), "coder convolution function application in" (Expand search), "coder convolution functional applications in" (Expand search), "coder convolution function implications in" (Expand search), "model convolution functions application in" (Expand search), "codes convolutional functions application in" (Expand search), "decoder convolutional functions application in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder convolution functions application in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder convolution functions application in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder convolution functions application in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder convolution functions application in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.