Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder computing using recurrence processing" » "coder computing using recurrence progression" (Expand search), "coder computing using sequence processing" (Expand search), "coder computing using recursive processing" (Expand search), "coder computing using recurrent processing" (Expand search), "coder computing using reference processing" (Expand search), "coder computing and recurrence processing" (Expand search), "modern computing using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "model computing using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "power computing using recurrence processing" (Expand search), "coder computing ufcg recurrence processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder computing using recurrence processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder computing using recurrence processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder computing using recurrence processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder computing using recurrence processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.