Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder commitment in algorithmic object" » "coder commitment in algorithm object" (Expand search), "coder commitment in algorithmic content" (Expand search), "coder commitment in algorithmic aspects" (Expand search), "power commitment in algorithmic object" (Expand search), "career commitment in algorithmic object" (Expand search), "leader commitment in algorithmic object" (Expand search), "coder commitment an algorithmic object" (Expand search), "coder commitment on algorithmic object" (Expand search), "coder commitment and algorithmic object" (Expand search), "coder commitment to algorithmic object" (Expand search), "coder commitment of algorithmic object" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder commitment in algorithmic object\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder commitment in algorithmic object ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder commitment in algorithmic object") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.