Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder collocation in algorithm in" » "power allocation in algorithm in" (Expand search), "des collocations in algorithm in" (Expand search), "and collocation in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder collocations in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder colocation in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder collocation and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder collocation in algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder collocation an algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder collocation on algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder collocation in algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder collocation in algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder collocation in algorithm with" (Expand search)
"api pythons python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder collocation in algorithm in") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder collocation in algorithm in\") OR (\"api pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder collocation in algorithm in ) OR ( api pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder collocation in algorithm in") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))*.