Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coherent precoding using type" » "coder coherent decoding using type" (Expand search), "coder coherent coding using type" (Expand search), "coder coherent breeding using type" (Expand search), "model coherent precoding using type" (Expand search), "under coherent precoding using type" (Expand search), "mode coherent precoding using type" (Expand search), "coder coherent precoding using the" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coherent precoding using type\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coherent precoding using type ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coherent precoding using type") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.