Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using television coverage" » "coder coding using stereovision coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding in television coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using revision coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding using television coverage" (Expand search), "color coding using television coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding using television coverage" (Expand search), "coder loading using television coverage" (Expand search), "coder modeling using television coverage" (Expand search), "coder drying using television coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using television coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using television coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using television coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.