Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using subsampling errors" » "coder coding using sampling errors" (Expand search), "coder coding using nonsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder coding using sampling error" (Expand search), "coder coding and subsampling errors" (Expand search), "modern coding using subsampling errors" (Expand search), "color coding using subsampling errors" (Expand search), "odor coding using subsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder loading using subsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder modeling using subsampling errors" (Expand search), "coder drying using subsampling errors" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using subsampling errors") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using subsampling errors\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using subsampling errors ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using subsampling errors") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.