Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using sequence effect" » "coder coding using sequence effects" (Expand search), "coder coding using frequency effect" (Expand search), "coder coding using sequencing effects" (Expand search), "coder coding single sequence effect" (Expand search), "coder coding mixing sequence effect" (Expand search), "modern coding using sequence effect" (Expand search), "color coding using sequence effect" (Expand search), "odor coding using sequence effect" (Expand search), "coder loading using sequence effect" (Expand search), "coder modeling using sequence effect" (Expand search), "coder drying using sequence effect" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using sequence effect") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using sequence effect\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using sequence effect ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using sequence effect") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.