Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using sequence discourse" » "coder coding using sequence discursive" (Expand search), "coder coding using science discourse" (Expand search), "coder coding using sequences discursive" (Expand search), "coder coding using frequency discourse" (Expand search), "coder coding single sequence discourse" (Expand search), "coder coding mixing sequence discourse" (Expand search), "modern coding using sequence discourse" (Expand search), "color coding using sequence discourse" (Expand search), "odor coding using sequence discourse" (Expand search), "coder loading using sequence discourse" (Expand search), "coder modeling using sequence discourse" (Expand search), "coder drying using sequence discourse" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using sequence discourse") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using sequence discourse\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using sequence discourse ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.