Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using sequence detection" » "coder coding using sequence deletion" (Expand search), "coder coding using sequence generation" (Expand search), "coder coding using sequence prediction" (Expand search), "coder coding using frequency detection" (Expand search), "coder coding single sequence detection" (Expand search), "coder coding mixing sequence detection" (Expand search), "modern coding using sequence detection" (Expand search), "color coding using sequence detection" (Expand search), "odor coding using sequence detection" (Expand search), "coder loading using sequence detection" (Expand search), "coder modeling using sequence detection" (Expand search), "coder drying using sequence detection" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using sequence detection") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using sequence detection\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using sequence detection ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.