Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using samples complexity" » "coder coding using sample complexity" (Expand search), "coder coding using stimulus complexity" (Expand search), "coder coding using complexo complexity" (Expand search), "coder coding using simple complexity" (Expand search), "coder coding cutting samples complexity" (Expand search), "coder coding lung samples complexity" (Expand search), "modern coding using samples complexity" (Expand search), "color coding using samples complexity" (Expand search), "odor coding using samples complexity" (Expand search), "coder loading using samples complexity" (Expand search), "coder modeling using samples complexity" (Expand search), "coder drying using samples complexity" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using samples complexity\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using samples complexity ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using samples complexity") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.