Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using revisited in" » "coder coding aging revisited in" (Expand search), "coder coding lying revisited in" (Expand search), "coder coding song revisited in" (Expand search), "modern coding using revisited in" (Expand search), "color coding using revisited in" (Expand search), "odor coding using revisited in" (Expand search), "coder loading using revisited in" (Expand search), "coder modeling using revisited in" (Expand search), "coder drying using revisited in" (Expand search), "coder coding using revisited _" (Expand search), "coder coding using revisited by" (Expand search), "coder coding using revisited the" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using revisited in") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using revisited in\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using revisited in ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using revisited in") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.