Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using reliability functions" » "coder coding using reliability function" (Expand search), "coder coding using desirability functions" (Expand search), "coder coding using desirability function" (Expand search), "coder coding in reliability functions" (Expand search), "coder coding and reliability functions" (Expand search), "coder coding human reliability functions" (Expand search), "modern coding using reliability functions" (Expand search), "color coding using reliability functions" (Expand search), "odor coding using reliability functions" (Expand search), "coder loading using reliability functions" (Expand search), "coder modeling using reliability functions" (Expand search), "coder drying using reliability functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using reliability functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using reliability functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using reliability functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.