Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using pull scripting" » "coder coding using shell scripting" (Expand search), "coder coding using visual scripting" (Expand search), "modern coding using pull scripting" (Expand search), "color coding using pull scripting" (Expand search), "odor coding using pull scripting" (Expand search), "coder loading using pull scripting" (Expand search), "coder modeling using pull scripting" (Expand search), "coder drying using pull scripting" (Expand search), "coder coding using full scripting" (Expand search), "coder coding using pulse scripting" (Expand search), "coder coding using pure scripting" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using pull scripting\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using pull scripting ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using pull scripting") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.