Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in pigeon python python programming" » "in pigeon pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in pigeon piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pigeon pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in pigeons python python programming" (Expand search), "and pigeon python python programming" (Expand search), "of pigeon python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding using low coverage" » "modern coding using low coverage" (Expand search), "color coding using low coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding using low coverage" (Expand search), "coder modeling using low coverage" (Expand search), "coder drying using low coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using code coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using and coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using in coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using low coverage") OR ("in pigeon python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using low coverage\") OR (\"in pigeon python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using low coverage ) OR ( in pigeon python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using low coverage") OR ("in pigeon python python programming"))*.