Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding using loop sampling" » "coder coding using blood sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using clock sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using cloud sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using loop sampling" (Expand search), "color coding using loop sampling" (Expand search), "odor coding using loop sampling" (Expand search), "coder loading using loop sampling" (Expand search), "coder modeling using loop sampling" (Expand search), "coder drying using loop sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using low sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using long sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using log sampling" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using loop sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using loop sampling\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using loop sampling ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using loop sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.