Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using loop efficiency" » "coder coding using crop efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coding using rop efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coding using group efficiency" (Expand search), "modern coding using loop efficiency" (Expand search), "color coding using loop efficiency" (Expand search), "odor coding using loop efficiency" (Expand search), "coder loading using loop efficiency" (Expand search), "coder modeling using loop efficiency" (Expand search), "coder drying using loop efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coding using low efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coding using long efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coding using log efficiency" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using loop efficiency\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using loop efficiency ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using loop efficiency") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.