Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding using live sampling" » "coder coding using line sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using time sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using wipe sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using live sampling" (Expand search), "color coding using live sampling" (Expand search), "odor coding using live sampling" (Expand search), "coder modeling using live sampling" (Expand search), "coder drying using live sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using olive sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using life sampling" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using live sampling\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using live sampling ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using live sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.