Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using lexical coverage" » "coder coding using maximal coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using local coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using political coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using medical coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using chemical coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using clinical coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "color coding using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "coder loading using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "coder modeling using lexical coverage" (Expand search), "coder drying using lexical coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using lexical coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using lexical coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using lexical coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using lexical coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.