Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using ips implementation" » "coder coding using its implementation" (Expand search), "coder coding using is implementation" (Expand search), "coder coding using ipsas implementation" (Expand search), "modern coding using ips implementation" (Expand search), "color coding using ips implementation" (Expand search), "odor coding using ips implementation" (Expand search), "coder modeling using ips implementation" (Expand search), "coder drying using ips implementation" (Expand search), "coder coding using hips implementation" (Expand search), "coder coding using tips implementation" (Expand search), "coder coding using ip implementation" (Expand search)
"api piton python python programming" » "api piton pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api piton pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api piton pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api in python python programming" (Expand search), "api with python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using ips implementation\") OR (\"api piton python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using ips implementation ) OR ( api piton python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using ips implementation") OR ("api piton python python programming"))*.