Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using insertion applied" » "coder coding using intention applied" (Expand search), "coder coding using interaction applied" (Expand search), "coder coding using integration applied" (Expand search), "coder coding using inertial applied" (Expand search), "coder coding using induction applied" (Expand search), "coder coding using information applied" (Expand search), "modern coding using insertion applied" (Expand search), "color coding using insertion applied" (Expand search), "odor coding using insertion applied" (Expand search), "coder loading using insertion applied" (Expand search), "coder modeling using insertion applied" (Expand search), "coder drying using insertion applied" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using insertion applied\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using insertion applied ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using insertion applied") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.