Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using improve function" » "coder coding using improve functional" (Expand search), "coder coding using improves functional" (Expand search), "coder coding using improved functional" (Expand search), "coder coding using improved function" (Expand search), "coder coding using improvised function" (Expand search), "coder coding tuning improves function" (Expand search), "modern coding using improve function" (Expand search), "color coding using improve function" (Expand search), "odor coding using improve function" (Expand search), "coder loading using improve function" (Expand search), "coder modeling using improve function" (Expand search), "coder drying using improve function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using improve function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using improve function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using improve function ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using improve function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.