Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using frequency structures" » "coder coding using consequence structures" (Expand search), "coder coding using frequency features" (Expand search), "coder coding using frequency studies" (Expand search), "coder coding single frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder coding feeding frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder coding grazing frequency structures" (Expand search), "modern coding using frequency structures" (Expand search), "color coding using frequency structures" (Expand search), "odor coding using frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder loading using frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder modeling using frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder drying using frequency structures" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using frequency structures\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using frequency structures ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using frequency structures") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.