Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using dependency programming" » "coder coding using dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding using independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding using dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coding mining dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder coding doping dependence programming" (Expand search), "modern coding using dependency programming" (Expand search), "color coding using dependency programming" (Expand search), "odor coding using dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder loading using dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder modeling using dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder drying using dependency programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python of python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using dependency programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using dependency programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using dependency programming ) OR ( python in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using dependency programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.