Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using defocusing functions" » "coder coding using deciding functions" (Expand search), "coder coding using teaching functions" (Expand search), "coder coding using describing functions" (Expand search), "coder coding using denoising functions" (Expand search), "coder coding using decreasing functions" (Expand search), "coder coding agent defocusing functions" (Expand search), "modern coding using defocusing functions" (Expand search), "color coding using defocusing functions" (Expand search), "odor coding using defocusing functions" (Expand search), "coder loading using defocusing functions" (Expand search), "coder modeling using defocusing functions" (Expand search), "coder drying using defocusing functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using defocusing functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using defocusing functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using defocusing functions ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using defocusing functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.