Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using defocusing computation" » "coder coding using diffusing computation" (Expand search), "coder coding using processing computation" (Expand search), "coder coding using denoising computation" (Expand search), "coder coding using decreasing computation" (Expand search), "coder coding agent defocusing computation" (Expand search), "modern coding using defocusing computation" (Expand search), "color coding using defocusing computation" (Expand search), "odor coding using defocusing computation" (Expand search), "coder loading using defocusing computation" (Expand search), "coder modeling using defocusing computation" (Expand search), "coder drying using defocusing computation" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using defocusing computation\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using defocusing computation ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using defocusing computation") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.