Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using cnn's coverage" » "coder coding using news coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding using cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "color coding using cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding using cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "coder loading using cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "coder modeling using cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "coder drying using cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using cns coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using canines coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using arcan's coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding using cnn's coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using cnn's coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using cnn's coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.