Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding using basic parallelization" » "coder coding using based parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding using and parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding using hevc parallelization" (Expand search), "modern coding using basic parallelization" (Expand search), "color coding using basic parallelization" (Expand search), "odor coding using basic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder modeling using basic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder drying using basic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding using bac parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding using music parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding funding basic parallelization" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using basic parallelization\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using basic parallelization ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using basic parallelization") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.